Amanpour’s Bias Based on Hertiage – Media Analysis

By Alex Zielinski

On March 18, renowned CNN international correspondent Christiane Amanpour announced her transfer to ABC News’ ‘This Week’. This decision lead to a heated discussion over Amanpour’s qualifications for this position, as it would be covering national, rather than international news, and her alleged lack of news objectivity.

The  latter sugestion was brought up by The Washington Post‘s Tom Shales, best known for his TV review column, in his opinion piece titled “ABC’s choice of Amanpour for ‘This Week’ has critics inside the network and beyond.”

In this article, Shales examines Amanpour’s recent appointment from a negative angle- shining a light on her past flaws by citing questionable sources. He cites a Facebook group with 100 members, “Christiane Amanpour’s Outright Bias Against Israel Must Stop,” as his primary source as to why Amanpour holds prejudice against Israel. Additionally, Shales uses an “unnamed network veteran” of ABC as his only source inside the ABC newsroom and after claiming that “ABC News is practically in a state of internal revolt over her selection.”

The one issue discussed in Shales’ piece that I can understand is over her qualifications to be a national reporter. With a lifetime of experience working in international media, Amanpour has had surprisingly little participation in national news. Nonetheless, I see her as a talented journalist who can quickly change scenery and catch up on her new beat.

My biggest problem with Shales’ perspective are his claims to Amanpour’s bias.  Amanpour is half-Persian, and grew up in Iran during the Islamic revolution. Shales appears to reject Amanpour’s subjectivity altogether bases on this sole “accusation,” which is a frustrating realization.

This perspective subtly pushes a hegemonic view, assuming that any reporter with a non-American background (which, in reality, is the majority), would have a bias towards their country of origin. What a huge step backward in the world of international journalism.

Salon‘s Glenn Greenwald critiques Shales’ piece, and also sees the attack on Amanpour’s heritage unneccessary. “Could the double standard here be any more obvious or unpleasant?” writes Greenwald. He goes on to list multiple well-known journalists who have been accused of a pro-Israel bias, based on their Jewish background. However, Greenwald says, the Washington Post would never blame an American journalist for being excessively pro-Israel. It seems as though Shale simply needed a vague reason to come down on Amanpour.

The point of being a trustworthy journalist is to be able to put a barrier between your own opinion and your job. I believe that you are able to have your own strong beliefs, based on your cultural background or not, and still produce well-balanced, objective content.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Amanpour’s Bias Based on Hertiage – Media Analysis

  1. Tom Shales says:

    Thank you, Alex – your criticism of my Amanpour column was refreshingly temperate compared to bloggers who said they wanted to stab me or castrate me (yes, really) because of my opinions.
    Still – I beg to differ. My name is Shales, not Shale, for starters. I did not use the little Facebook group as “my primary source” — that is ridiculous; I just think the fact that they chose THAT for their name is indicative of suspicions about Amanpour’s ability to be objective on some issues. I did mention her biographical particulars, but never did I say that a person’s ethnic background should disqualify them from a particular news beat. Neither you nor my other critics could know this (and may not believe it, alas) but I included examples of what I considered Amanpour’s bias in my column. However, editors REMOVED them, which was terribly unfair to me. Thank you, nevertheless, for maintaining a civil tone as you raked me over the coals. — Tom

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s